Render to Caesar: The Christian’s Guide to Civic Duty

Introduction: The Coin and the Conundrum

The scene is charged with tension. Religious and political adversaries, the Pharisees and Herodians, approach Jesus with a question designed not for enlightenment, but for entrapment.¹ “Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?” (Matthew 22:17). Their query was a carefully laid snare. An affirmation would alienate His Jewish compatriots, who chafed under Roman occupation and the idolatrous implications of Caesar’s image on the imperial currency. A denial would mark Him as a revolutionary, inviting the swift and brutal retribution of Rome.¹ They sought to impale Him on the horns of an impossible political dilemma.

Jesus, perceiving their malice, called for a denarius, the coin used for the tax. “Whose image and inscription is this?” He asked. “Caesar’s,” they replied. Then came His masterful and eternally resonant response: “Therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Matthew 22:21, Mark 12:17, Luke 20:25).¹ His interrogators were “utterly amazed” ², their trap disarmed. Yet, Jesus’ words were far more than a clever evasion; they laid down a foundational principle for navigating the complex interplay of allegiance, authority, civic duty, and devotion to God ²—a principle that continues to challenge and guide believers as they seek to live faithfully in a world of competing claims.

The very nature of this “trick question” reveals a persistent human tendency to construct false dichotomies, particularly where faith intersects with public life. Often, individuals attempt to force an “either/or” decision—either complete subservience to the state or outright rejection of its authority—where a more nuanced understanding of distinct yet coexisting obligations under a sovereign God is required. Jesus’ answer refused this binary. Furthermore, by adding the crucial clause, “and to God the things that are God’s,” Jesus immediately elevated the discussion beyond a mere political or fiscal matter to a profoundly theological one. This masterstroke subtly asserted God’s ultimate sovereignty over all earthly powers, including Caesar himself. It implied that even our duties to terrestrial authorities must be understood and enacted within the overarching framework of our primary and all-encompassing allegiance to God.

Section 1: Honoring Earthly Authorities – A Divine Expectation

1.1 God’s Ordination of Government

The Scriptures consistently teach that governing authorities are not accidental or purely human constructs but are, in principle, instituted by God. The Apostle Paul, writing to believers in Rome, the very heart of imperial power, states unequivocally: “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment” (Romans 13:1-2).⁴ This divine institution does not signify an unconditional endorsement of every governmental action or policy. Rather, it affirms the principle of governance itself as a necessary framework for maintaining order, restraining evil, and promoting a degree of stability in a fallen world.⁴

It is profoundly significant that Paul penned these words under the reign of Emperor Nero, a ruler who would become infamous for his cruelty and persecution of Christians.⁵ This historical context underscores that the command to submit is primarily to God’s ordained structure of authority rather than an implicit approval of the individual ruler’s character or their specific decrees. The legitimacy of the office, in God’s design for societal order, is distinct from the personal righteousness (or lack thereof) of the office-holder. Consequently, a Christian’s submission, in this sense, becomes an act of obedience to God’s overarching plan for human society, allowing for a respectful posture even amidst profound disagreement or suffering under unjust rule. This understanding also implies that rebellion against legitimate governing authority, as an institution, is viewed as rebellion against what God has instituted, carrying with it inherent consequences, both civil and potentially spiritual, for disrupting God’s intended order.⁴ This does not negate the possibility of conscientious objection in specific circumstances, as seen in Acts 4:19-20, but it sets a high bar, reserving such actions for instances where government commands direct disobedience to God’s clear mandates.

1.2 The Purpose of Government

The divine ordination of government is not arbitrary; it has a defined purpose. According to the Apostle Peter, rulers are “sent by him [God] to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good” (1 Peter 2:14).⁶ Similarly, Paul, in his letter to Titus, encourages believers “to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good work” (Titus 3:1), which includes cooperating with governmental structures for the common welfare.⁸ The ideal function of government, from a biblical perspective, is therefore to uphold justice, protect its citizens from harm, and maintain a societal environment where good can flourish and evil is restrained.

When a government fundamentally and persistently acts contrary to this God-ordained purpose—for instance, by consistently punishing good and rewarding evil—it begins to forfeit its moral legitimacy in the eyes of God, even if its coercive power remains intact. While a general submission to the structure of authority might still be counseled to avoid societal chaos (as some commentators suggest, even bad government can be preferable to anarchy ⁴), the moral foundation for enthusiastic cooperation erodes. In such situations, the grounds for prophetic critique and, in extreme cases, conscientious objection, gain strength. Conversely, the call for believers to be “ready for every good work” ⁹ implies a proactive and constructive form of citizenship. This involves more than mere compliance; it suggests a positive responsibility to contribute to the common good, utilizing one’s skills and resources within societal structures, including those related to governance, to seek the peace and welfare of the community. This demonstrates that faith is not merely a private affair but entails a public responsibility.

1.3 Our Response: Submission, Respect, and Civic Duties

The scriptural mandate to honor earthly authorities translates into specific, practical responses from believers. These include submission “for the Lord’s sake” (1 Peter 2:13), an act that recognizes God’s ultimate sovereignty even in our civic interactions.⁶ Paying taxes, the very issue brought to Jesus, is affirmed as a legitimate duty.⁴ Paul elaborates in Romans 13:6-7: “For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.” This respect and honor are due to the office, recognizing its divine institution.¹⁰

The directive to “Honor the emperor” (1 Peter 2:17), given at a time when the emperor was likely the persecuting Nero ⁶, highlights a profound spiritual discipline. This honor cannot be contingent on the leader’s personal virtue or the alignment of their policies with Christian values. Instead, it is directed towards the God-ordained institution of authority that the leader represents. Such an act of honoring the office, despite the potential failings of the person holding it, becomes a powerful witness. It demonstrates that the Christian’s ultimate hope and stability are not vested in human leaders or political systems but in God, who remains sovereign even over flawed and antagonistic rulers. This distinguishes the believer from a mere political partisan, whose support is conditional. Furthermore, the fulfillment of civic duties like paying taxes is framed not simply as a legal requirement but as an action that can be “glorifying to God” ¹⁰ and contributes to maintaining a “clear conscience” before God and humanity.⁴ This perspective elevates even mundane civic responsibilities to acts of spiritual significance, integrating faith into the practicalities of daily life and demonstrating responsible stewardship within the society God has placed us.

Section 2: The Unmistakable Claim of God – What is God’s?

2.1 Beyond the Coin: We Bear God’s Image

Jesus’ instruction to “render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s” was immediately followed by the more profound and far-reaching command: “and to God the things that are God’s”.¹ If the denarius, bearing Caesar’s image and inscription, rightfully belonged to Caesar, a far more significant question arises: what bears God’s image? The Scriptures declare that humanity was created in the very image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27). Therefore, “the things that are God’s” are not merely a portion of our income or specific religious duties, but our entire selves—our lives, our worship, our ultimate allegiance, and our dedicated service.¹ We belong to Him because we bear His imprint.²

This “render to God” clause radically expands the scope of allegiance from a transactional civic duty to a total life orientation. Our relationship with God is not meant to be one loyalty among many, but the foundational relationship that defines, informs, and rightly orders all others. The shift in Jesus’ analogy from a material object (the coin) to a living being (the human person) signifies a vastly more comprehensive and personal claim. God’s claim is not just on a segment of our resources or a fraction of our time, but on our entire existence—heart, soul, mind, and strength. This redefines “giving to God” from mere outward religious observance or charitable contributions to the complete and willing surrender of the self. Moreover, the understanding that all human beings are created in God’s image carries profound ethical implications. If we belong to God because we bear His image, then this inherent dignity and divine ownership applies universally to every person. Consequently, actions that devalue, oppress, or harm others are not only offenses against humanity but also sacrilegious affronts to the God in whose image they are made. This insight inextricably links our vertical allegiance to God with our horizontal responsibilities to our fellow human beings, grounding all ethics and calls for social justice in a robust theological understanding of creation and divine ownership.

2.2 The Honor and Reverence Due to Our Father and Master

The prophet Malachi records God’s poignant challenge to the priests of Israel, who had grown complacent and disrespectful in their service: “‘A son honors his father, and a servant his master. If then I am a father, where is my honor? And if I am a master, where is my fear?’ says the LORD of hosts to you, O priests, who despise my name. But you say, ‘How have we despised your name?'” (Malachi 1:6).¹² This passage powerfully underscores the relational aspect of our duty to God. He is not an abstract deity or a distant cosmic force, but our Heavenly Father and our Divine Master, who is inherently deserving of heartfelt honor and reverent fear—an awe-filled respect that shapes our attitudes and actions.¹² The priests’ failure to offer this, despite their privileged position and knowledge of God’s law, manifested in their offering of “incorrect, apathetic sacrifices” ¹², and serves as a solemn warning to all who claim to know and serve Him.

God’s appeal in Malachi to common human relational norms—the honor a son naturally owes his father, the respect a servant gives his master—reveals that the devotion He expects is not an esoteric or unduly burdensome requirement. Instead, it is a natural and fitting response to His intrinsic character and His covenant relationship with His people. The priests’ failure was a tragic perversion of these fundamental relational dynamics, indicating a spiritual dysfunction more profound than that of ordinary people who understood and generally adhered to these societal norms of respect. True spirituality should enhance and rightly order our natural affections and duties, not negate them. A failure to honor God as both Father and Master signals a deep-seated problem of the heart. Furthermore, the priests’ bewildered and defensive response, “How have we despised Your name?” ¹², is a critical warning about the insidious danger of religious formalism and spiritual blindness. It reveals that it is possible to be actively engaged in outward religious duties while possessing a heart that is distant from God and indifferent to His true honor. This underscores the necessity for all believers, especially those in positions of spiritual leadership or influence, to engage in constant self-examination and maintain a tender sensitivity to God’s Word, lest they too succumb to such spiritual apathy.

2.3 The Impossibility of a Divided Heart: God or Mammon?

Jesus extends the principle of ultimate allegiance beyond the realm of political authorities to encompass all potential idols that vie for the supreme place in our hearts. In the Sermon on the Mount, He declares with stark clarity: “No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money (Mammon)” (Matthew 6:24).¹⁴ “Mammon” is an Aramaic term for wealth or possessions, but here it is personified as a rival master, representing anything—material wealth, career ambitions, reputation, personal security, or even ideologies—that competes with God for ultimate loyalty and trust.¹⁵ True service, Jesus teaches, demands an undivided heart and singular devotion.¹⁵

The “two masters” principle reveals that the primary battle for our allegiance is often fought not on grand political or public stages, but in the quiet, everyday decisions of the heart regarding what we treasure and where we seek our ultimate security and satisfaction. Jesus’ teaching on Mammon is situated within a broader discourse on inner attitudes and motivations, emphasizing that our daily choices concerning finances, possessions, career pursuits, and lifestyle are profoundly spiritual and serve as battlegrounds for our allegiance. The “master” we truly serve is revealed not by our occasional grand gestures, but by the consistent direction of our practical devotions and where our ultimate trust lies.¹⁴ The strong relational and emotional terms Jesus employs—”hate” versus “love,” “devoted to” versus “despise” ¹⁴—indicate that allegiance is not merely an intellectual assent or a formal declaration. It is an affective, volitional commitment that deeply shapes our desires, priorities, and actions. Neutrality or lukewarmness in this contest of allegiance is unsustainable; the heart will inevitably incline more strongly towards one master, thereby diminishing its affection and dedication to the other. This implies that true devotion to God involves not just outward obedience but also a cultivated love and desire for Him that progressively displaces the allure of competing “masters,” requiring a genuine transformation of our affections.

Section 3: When Loyalties Collide – The Line of Ultimate Obedience

3.1 The Apostolic Stand: “We Must Obey God Rather Than Men”

There are moments when the claims of earthly authorities directly conflict with the clear commands of God. The Book of Acts provides a pivotal example. When Peter and John were brought before the Sanhedrin—the highest Jewish religious and civil council—and commanded “not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus” (Acts 4:18), their response was unambiguous: “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge. For we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard” (Acts 4:19-20).¹⁶ Later, when confronted again and reminded of this prohibition, Peter and the apostles declared even more directly, “We must obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). This apostolic stand establishes the foundational biblical principle that God’s authority is preeminent, and when human laws or directives require disobedience to divine mandates, the believer’s ultimate obligation is to God.¹⁶

The apostles’ challenge to the Sanhedrin, “you must judge,” was not a deferral of their own decision-making responsibility, nor was it an expression of uncertainty. They had already determined their unwavering course of action: “we cannot but speak”.¹⁷ Rather, their words served as a powerful rhetorical device, highlighting the self-evident nature of prioritizing God’s command and thereby placing the moral onus squarely upon the authorities themselves. It was an implicit assertion of a universal moral standard, discernible “in the sight of God,” to which even the esteemed Sanhedrin was accountable. This suggests that when believers are compelled by conscience to take a stand for God against human edicts, their appeal is not to private, subjective whim or mere rebelliousness, but to a higher, objective divine truth that ought to be recognizable. Furthermore, the compelling inner conviction expressed by the apostles—”we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard”—reveals that their unwavering obedience to God stemmed from a profound, transformative personal encounter with the risen Christ and a clear understanding of His divine commission to be His witnesses. This experiential knowledge and divine mandate created an inner necessity that superseded any human command to be silent. It indicates that true Christian courage in the face of opposition is often fueled by such deep, personal conviction, born of an authentic experience with God and a clear grasp of His revealed will, rather than by abstract theological principles alone.

3.2 Discerning the Line: Wisdom, Not Whim

The principle of “obeying God rather than men” is a sacred responsibility, not a license for anarchy or a convenient pretext for disregarding laws based on personal preference, inconvenience, or political disagreement.³ Discerning when a human law or command genuinely necessitates such a stand requires careful, prayerful deliberation, a solid grounding in the full counsel of Scripture, and often, the collective wisdom and accountability of the believing community. The threshold for civil disobedience, from a biblical perspective, is notably high: it is generally reserved for clear and unambiguous cases where human law directly contravenes an explicit command of God or compels actions that God forbids.¹⁶ As one commentary notes, “The church that seeks conflict unnecessarily is not following the Lord”.¹⁶

True discernment in these complex situations demands a critical distinction between God’s clear, non-negotiable commands and our own personal or cultural preferences, political leanings, or interpretations of disputable matters. The former may, in rare and extreme circumstances, necessitate conscientious disobedience to human law; the latter rarely, if ever, do. The apostles in Acts 4 faced a direct prohibition of a core divine mandate: the proclamation of Christ. This is vastly different from disagreeing with tax policies or feeling inconvenienced by regulations that do not compel sin.³ The danger of misapplication lies in subjectivism if this crucial distinction is not carefully maintained. The historical record reveals both the misuse of submission texts like Romans 13 by tyrannical regimes to demand unquestioning obedience ⁴, and, conversely, legitimate, God-honoring acts of civil disobedience against unjust laws that violated God’s higher law (such as the early Adventist stance against the Fugitive Slave Act ⁴ or the apostles’ defiance of the Sanhedrin). This inherent tension demonstrates that navigating these issues is an ongoing challenge for the Church. It requires not a simplistic, one-size-fits-all rule, but constant re-evaluation of specific situations in light of Scripture, historical context, and communal discernment to wisely apply these enduring principles in ever-changing socio-political landscapes.

3.3 The Cost and Witness of Faithfulness

Faithful obedience to God, especially when it brings believers into conflict with earthly powers, often comes at a significant personal cost. This cost may range from social ostracism and economic disadvantage to imprisonment, physical suffering, or even martyrdom.⁷ Yet, the response of the early apostles to such opposition was not one of bitterness or despair, but of remarkable joy. After being flogged for defying the Sanhedrin’s order, they left “rejoicing because they had been counted worthy of suffering disgrace for the Name”.¹⁷ This extraordinary attitude reveals that our conduct, even when engaging in conscientious objection or facing persecution, should ideally be characterized by grace, respect for adversaries where possible, and an unwavering, clear witness to the supreme worth and lordship of Christ.

The apostles’ rejoicing in suffering reframes persecution not as a mark of defeat or divine abandonment, but as a profound honor and a validation of their intimate identification with Christ and His mission.¹⁷ This perspective has the power to transform the believer’s experience of opposition, turning what the world views as a negative into a source of deep spiritual joy and assurance. It signifies solidarity with the suffering Savior and participation in His redemptive purposes. Moreover, the manner in which believers endure suffering or engage in acts of civil disobedience can be as powerful a witness as the act of obedience itself. Stephen, as he was being unjustly stoned to death, reflected the character of Christ by praying for his executioners, his face reportedly like that of an angel, his eyes fixed on the glory of God.¹⁶ This demonstrates that the how of our stand is crucial for our witness. A spirit of love, forgiveness, humility, and an unwavering focus on God, even amidst profound injustice, powerfully testifies to the transformative reality of the Gospel. Our response to opposition can either commend or compromise the message we proclaim; Christ-like suffering possesses immense apologetic and evangelistic power.

Reflection: Navigating Our Dual Citizenship with Wisdom and Integrity

The tapestry of scriptures explored reveals that the believer lives with a unique “dual citizenship.” We are citizens of an earthly nation, with attendant responsibilities and duties, yet our primary and defining identity is that of citizens of heaven (Philippians 3:20).¹⁸ This reality presents the daily challenge of living “in the world but not of the world,” of navigating our earthly obligations while maintaining an ultimate allegiance to our Divine King. It is a call to walk with wisdom and integrity, keeping a pure heart and a clear conscience before God and humanity.¹⁰ The Apostle Peter provides a concise and powerful guide for this balanced life: “Live as free people, yet do not use your freedom as a pretext for evil, but live as servants of God. Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor” (1 Peter 2:16-17).⁶

This concept of “dual citizenship” is not about a neatly divided 50/50 split in loyalty. Rather, it is about understanding that our heavenly citizenship is paramount and fundamentally conditions our earthly one.¹⁰ Our ultimate allegiance to God provides the moral framework, the spiritual motivation, and the necessary boundaries for responsible engagement in the earthly realm. Our terrestrial responsibilities are undertaken as citizens of heaven, “for the Lord’s sake” ¹⁹, meaning that our heavenly identity is not an escape from earthly duties but the very lens through which they are understood, prioritized, and performed. Furthermore, Peter’s specific ordering in 1 Peter 2:17—”Fear God. Honor the emperor”—is instructive. The call to “fear God,” signifying a profound reverential awe and unwavering obedience, is strategically placed before the command to “honor the emperor.” This suggests that a proper, all-encompassing reverence for God is the prerequisite and the indispensable foundation for rightly honoring human authorities and navigating all other earthly relationships and obligations. When the fear of God is primary in a believer’s heart, the honor given to human rulers will be rendered in a way that is consistent with God’s commands and honors His ultimate sovereignty, preventing the respect due to human authority from degenerating into idolatrous subservience or leading to a compromise of divine principles.

To aid in this ongoing navigation, the following principles, drawn from the scriptures, offer a framework for reflection:

Scriptural Theme/Verse(s)	Obligation to Earthly Realm	Obligation/Allegiance to God	Guiding Principle for Believers
Render to Caesar & God (Matt 22:21; Mark 12:17; Luke 20:25)	Pay taxes, obey laws, respect symbols of authority.	Give your whole self (as an image-bearer of God); He is the ultimate owner.	Fulfill civic duties conscientiously while recognizing God’s all-encompassing claim on your life and ultimate allegiance.
Submission to Authority (Rom 13:1-7; 1 Pet 2:13-17; Tit 3:1)	Submit to governing structures, respect officials, pay taxes.	He ordains authority for order; submit “for the Lord’s sake.”	Respect human governance as divinely instituted for societal order and justice, as an expression of obedience to God.
Undivided Devotion (Matt 6:24; Mal 1:6)	Be an honest and productive member of society.	He is Father & Master, due exclusive honor, fear, and wholehearted service; He is the sole Master, tolerating no rivals.	Cultivate wholehearted, exclusive devotion to God, ensuring no earthly loyalty (wealth, power, ideology) usurps His place.
Ultimate Obedience to God (Acts 4:19-20; Acts 5:29)	Generally obey laws and authorities.	Prioritize His direct commands above all; He is the supreme authority.	When human laws directly contradict God’s clear commands, obey God with wisdom, courage, and grace.

Call to Action: Living Out Our True Allegiance

The principles illuminated by these sacred texts are not merely for intellectual understanding but for heartfelt application. They call us to a life of conscious, deliberate, and faithful allegiance to God in every sphere.

• Examine Your Heart:
  The first step is honest introspection. Ask prayerfully: Who or what truly holds the “master” position in my life?.14 Am I offering God the authentic honor and reverent fear due to Him as my Heavenly Father and Divine Master, or has my devotion become diluted, apathetic, or merely formal, like that of the priests in Malachi’s day?.12 Identify any “Mammon” figures—be they material wealth, career ambitions, social standing, personal relationships, political ideologies, or even self-will—that compete with God for the supreme allegiance of your heart.14 This requires vigilance against the subtle encroachment of idols and the ever-present danger of spiritual self-deception.
• Engage Responsibly as a Citizen:
  Our heavenly citizenship should make us better, not worse, earthly citizens. Therefore, actively and conscientiously fulfill your civic duties. Pay taxes honestly, obey just laws, pray for leaders at all levels of government (1 Timothy 2:1-2) 10, and be “ready for every good work” (Titus 3:1) that promotes the well-being of your community and reflects the goodness of God.8 Remember that this engagement is not merely a secular obligation but an integral part of your Christian witness, an opportunity to demonstrate the practical outworking of your faith “for the Lord’s sake”.6 Such constructive citizenship reflects the spiritual significance inherent even in mundane duties.
• Give God His Due – Your Whole Self:
  The most profound implication of Jesus’ teaching is that what is “God’s” is ultimately ourselves, for we are created in His image.1 Move beyond a compartmentalized religion that confines God to one segment of life. Instead, consciously consecrate your entire being—your thoughts, desires, words, and actions—to Him. Prioritize His Kingdom and His righteousness in all your decisions: how you steward your time, deploy your talents, and utilize your treasures. Strive to live as a “living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God,” which is your spiritual act of worship (Romans 12:1). This calls for a radical reorientation of life around His Lordship, fueled by a transformed heart and affections.
• Be Prepared to Stand with Grace and Courage:
  Cultivate spiritual courage rooted in deep biblical conviction and the wisdom to discern those rare but real moments when earthly demands genuinely and irreconcilably conflict with God’s clear commands.16 If such a stand becomes necessary, resolve to take it with humility, with respect for others (even adversaries) where possible, and always with a clear, gracious testimony to the Lordship of Christ.17 Understand that such faithfulness may involve personal cost, but also that it is in these very moments that God’s grace is often most powerfully displayed and our witness most profoundly impactful. This requires discernment to distinguish divine imperatives from personal preferences, and a commitment to Christ-like conduct even in the crucible of opposition.

May we, by God’s grace, navigate the complexities of our dual allegiances with unwavering faithfulness, ever rendering to Caesar what is Caesar’s, but above all, joyfully and completely rendering to God the totality of what is His.

Works cited

1. What does Matthew 22:21 mean? | BibleRef.com, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.bibleref.com/Matthew/22/Matthew-22-21.html
2. What does Mark 12:17 mean? | BibleRef.com, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.bibleref.com/Mark/12/Mark-12-17.html
3. What does Luke 20:25 mean? | BibleRef.com, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.bibleref.com/Luke/20/Luke-20-25.html
4. http://www.andrews.edu, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.andrews.edu/library/car/cardigital/Periodicals/Spectrum/2020/2020_04_011.pdf
5. What does Romans 13:1 mean? | BibleRef.com, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.bibleref.com/Romans/13/Romans-13-1.html
6. 1 Peter 2:13-17 Commentary | Precept Austin, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.preceptaustin.org/1peter_verse_by_verse_213-25
7. Fear God and Honor the Government (1 Peter 2:13–17) – Radical, accessed June 4, 2025, https://radical.net/podcasts/pray-the-word/fear-god-and-honor-the-government-1-peter-213-17/
8. Titus 3:1 Commentary | Precept Austin, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.preceptaustin.org/titus_31-8
9. Commending Christ to the World (Titus 3:1-8) – Emmanuel …, accessed June 4, 2025, https://eccelmira.org/articles/commending-christ-to-the-world/
10. Ultimate Allegiance Belongs to God (Matthew 22:21) – Radical.net, accessed June 4, 2025, https://radical.net/podcasts/pray-the-word/ultimate-allegiance-belongs-to-god-matthew-2221/
11. Pay Your Taxes, but Give Yourself to Jesus: Mark 12:13-17 – Redeemer Bible Church, accessed June 4, 2025, https://redeemerbible.org/blog-1/2017/7/5/pay-your-taxes-but-give-yourself-to-jesus-mark-1213-17
12. What does Malachi 1:6 mean? | BibleRef.com, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.bibleref.com/Malachi/1/Malachi-1-6.html
13. Malachi 1:6 – Bible Verse Meaning and Commentary | Bible Study …, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/gills-exposition-of-the-bible/malachi-1-6.html
14. What does Matthew 6:24 mean? | BibleRef.com, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.bibleref.com/Matthew/6/Matthew-6-24.html
15. Matthew 6:24 Commentary | Precept Austin, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.preceptaustin.org/matthew_624
16. GETTING THE MESSAGE/Acts 4:19-20 – Neshoba Democrat, accessed June 4, 2025, https://www.neshobademocrat.com/stories/getting-the-messageacts-419-20,43708
17. Who Should We Follow? – Acts 4:19-20 – A Clay Jar, accessed June 4, 2025, https://aclayjar.net/2013/12/who-ya-gonna-listen-to/
18. Faith and Politics: Navigating Our Dual Allegiance – Pastors.ai, accessed June 4, 2025, https://pastors.ai/sermon/faith-and-politics-navigating-our-dual-allegiance/103/%20%28Vive%20City%20Chapel%29%20references%20Matthew%2022%3A15-21%2C%20where%20Jesus%20discusses%20rendering%20unto%20Caesar%20what%20is%20Caesar%27s%20and%20unto%20God%20what%20is%20God%27s.%20This%20passage%20is%20used%20to%20support%20the%20idea%20that%20Christians%20have%20obligations%20to%20both%20earthly%20authorities%20and%20God%2C%20reinforcing%20the%20dual%20allegiance%20theme.%20Additionally%2C%201%20Timothy%202%3A1%20is%20mentioned%2C%20emphasizing%20the%20mandate%20for%20believers%20to%20pray%20for%20those%20in%20governmental%20authority%2C%20further%20connecting%20the%20responsibility%20of%20political%20engagement%20with%20spiritual%20practice.
19. “Honor the King”: Submission to Civil Authority | Religious Studies Center, accessed June 4, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/ministry-peter-chief-apostle/honor-king-submission-civil-authority